Clean up the trash
TL;DR: Eliminate unused functions, constants, and "just-in-case" code.
Problems Addressedhttps://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-ii-o96s3wl4?embedable=true
https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xi-sit35t1?embedable=true
https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxx?embedable=true
StepsYou can perform baby steps and remove the unnecessary code in iterations.
SafetyThis refactoring is safe if you thoroughly test your application after the changes. Static analysis tools can help ensure you don't remove anything still in use.
Why is the Code Better?You improve clarity and reduce complexity by removing unused elements.
Your code becomes easier to understand and maintain.
Reducing speculative code also keeps your focus on current, actual requirements.
How Does it Improve the Bijection?Dead code and speculative elements break Bijection between your software and the real-world model.
Removing these elements ensures your code accurately represents your MAPPER, making it cleaner and closer to reality.
LimitationsRemoving dead code requires confidence that it's truly unused.
This process relies on static analysis or thorough codebase knowledge, which can be error-prone without robust tools.
Refactor with AI| Without Proper Instructions | With Specific Instructions | |----|----| | ChatGPT | ChatGPT | | Claude | Claude | | Perplexity | Perplexity | | Copilot | Copilot | | Gemini | Gemini |
Tagshttps://hackernoon.com/improving-the-code-one-line-at-a-time?embedable=true
CreditsThis article is part of the Refactoring Series.
https://maximilianocontieri.com/how-to-improve-your-code-with-easy-refactorings?embedable=true
\
All Rights Reserved. Copyright , Central Coast Communications, Inc.