Your resource for web content, online publishing
and the distribution of digital products.
«  
  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Preliminaries We Used to Classify Languages: Fixing a Finite Alphabet

DATE POSTED:January 29, 2025
Table of Links

Abstract and 1 Introduction

2 Preliminaries

3 Temporal Hierarchies

4 Rating Maps

5 Optimal Imprints for TL(AT)

6 Conclusion and References

\ Appendix A. Appendix to Section 2

Appendix B. Appendix to Section 3

Appendix C. Appendix to Section 4

Appendix D. Appendix to Section 5

2. Preliminaries

\

\ Remark 1. The only infinite monoids that we consider are of the form A∗ . From now on, we implicitly assume that every other monoid M, N, . . . appearing in the paper is finite.

\

\ We shall also consider the class LT of locally testable languages [6, 44]. It consists of all finite Boolean combinations of languages A∗wA∗ , wA∗ and A∗w where w ∈ A∗ is a word.

\ Decision problems. These problems depend on a parameter class C. We use them as tools for analyzing C: intuitively, proving their decidability requires a solid understanding of C. The simplest one is C-membership. Its input is a regular language L. It asks whether L ∈ C.

\

\

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

:::info Authors:

(1) Thomas Place;

(2) Marc Zaitoun.

:::

\